“We tried small schools, it didn’t work.” In the early 2000s, the Gates Foundation put a bunch of money into creating new small schools and breaking down big high schools into smaller ones. I thought a lot of good work happened. Then after a few years, they released an evaluation that found that scores on bubble tests did not suddenly go up. For the past twenty years, if anyone says anything about small schools, someone will definitely say, “Not a good idea. Gates put money into small schools and it didn’t work.” Here’s Gemini’s summary, which after all is a reflection of what you can find on the internet: “The Gates foundation’s small high school initiative had mixed results, with a RAND study finding little positive impact on student outcomes and graduation rates overall.” Here’s the thing. A couple of years after that first report, they issued a second evaluation that found all kinds of better outcomes for students in the smaller schools. Lower suspensions, higher attendance, better grades, better parent and student satisfaction. However, the world had moved on and nobody read this report. Including our AI overlords, apparently. Now I’ve learned that the Gates Foundation has continued to follow those students to today. According to the latest evaluation, New York City small schools had a 10% higher graduation rate, 5% higher college enrollment, more engaged students, safer schools, and the schools were cost neutral. I recognize that I am trying to fight a communications war that is long since lost. Still though, in the spirit of evidence and accuracy, shout it with me from the rafters: “We tried small schools. It worked!”